We Explain Why GE Just Slashed Its Dividend Payment

General Electric, one of the nation’s biggest industrial companies, announced Monday it will slash its dividend payment in half to $0.12 from $0.24 per share.

Faced with slowing cash flow and a falling stock price, John Flannery, the company’s new chief executive, is hoping to boost the company’s prospects by plowing cash back into operations and focusing on fewer business units, according to industry experts.

This is only the third time in the company’s 125-year history that it has cut its dividend, according to Reuters. It also did so at the height of the Great Depression, and during the financial crisis of 2008 and 2009.

Why do companies cut their dividends?

Until recently, GE had been one of the biggest dividend payers in the U.S., distributing about $8 billion a year in cash annually to its shareholders, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Companies tend to cut their dividends, which are a share of profits distributed to shareholders typically on a quarterly or an annual basis, when their earnings decline or their cash flow isn’t sufficient to fund the dividend payment.

Going forward, GE may now take money it had used to pay a dividend and plow it back into the company. Plowing cash back into operations has proven an effective strategy for other public companies in recent years, experts say.

Weak earnings and falling stock price

GE, one of the largest companies in the U.S. with 300,000 employees, is a sprawling conglomerate. Its numerous business lines include the manufacture of aircraft engines, equipment for oil and gas mining, and diagnostic imaging systems for the healthcare industry, as well as home appliance manufacturing, not to mention consumer finance.

GE reported weaker than expected earnings in the third quarter, with particularly soft performance in its power generation and oil and gas segments, which both posted losses, according to reports.

The company also said cash flow to fund operations for the year would be about $7 billion, roughly half earlier estimates of $12 to $14 billion, according to the New York Times.

The last remaining original component of the Dow Jones Industrial Average, and once one of the most admired companies globally, its stock price has fallen about 35% in 2017.

Good news for GE, bad for investors?

Investors had been expecting GE to lower dividends — but it doesn’t mean they’re happy about it. The stock fell about 8% on Monday, following the announcement.

GE said it is cutting its dividend to align with a “revised capital allocation” program, which includes concentrating the business on three main units–aviation, power and health care.

“We are focused on driving total shareholder return and believe this is the right decision to align our dividend payout to cash flow generation,” John Flannery, GE’s chairman and chief executive said in a statement.

Top Takeways:

  • GE, one of the biggest companies in the U.S., has slashed its dividend in half.
  • The move is seen by analysts as a way to rescue the company’s flagging stock price.
  •  GE may now take money it had used to pay a dividend and plow it back into the company.
  • GE was one of the biggest dividend-paying companies in the U.S., distributing about $8 billion in profits annually.

 






Author:
Jeremy Quittner is the financial writer for Stash.



Disclaimers
This material has been distributed for informational and educational purposes only, represents an assessment of the market environment as of the date of publication, is subject to change without notice, and is not intended as investment, legal, accounting, or tax advice or opinion. Stash assumes no obligation to provide notifications of changes in any factors that could affect the information provided. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice regarding any issuer or security in particular. The strategies discussed are strictly for illustrative and educational purposes and should not be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell, or an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security. There is no guarantee that any strategies discussed will be effective.

Furthermore, the information presented does not take into consideration commissions, tax implications, or other transactional costs, which may significantly affect the economic consequences of a given strategy or investment decision. This information is not intended as a recommendation to invest in any particular asset class or strategy or as a promise of future performance. There is no guarantee that any investment strategy will work under all market conditions or is suitable for all investors. Each investor should evaluate their ability to invest long term, especially during periods of downturn in the market. Investors should not substitute these materials for professional services, and should seek advice from an independent advisor before acting on any information presented.

Past performance does not guarantee future results. There is a potential for loss as well as gain in investing. Stash does not represent in any manner that the circumstances described herein will result in any particular outcome. While the data and analysis Stash uses from third party sources is believed to be reliable, Stash does not guarantee the accuracy of such information. Nothing in this article should be considered as a solicitation or offer, or recommendation, to buy or sell any particular security or investment product or to engage in any investment strategy. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission. Stash does not provide personalized financial planning to investors, such as estate, tax, or retirement planning. Investment advisory services are only provided to investors who become Stash Clients pursuant to a written Advisory Agreement. For more information please visit www.stashinvest.com/disclosures.