Get the app
Get the app

Join millions of investors on Stash

Investing, simplified

Start today with as little as $5
Get the app
Money News

The Facebook and Russia Investigation: Do Companies Have Ethical Obligations?

November 16, 2018

2 min read

Facebook knew about Russian interference in the 2016  presidential election, but looked the other way and attempted to hide its involvement. It also employed lobbyists to smear rival tech companies in a campaign designed to take attention off itself, when it surfaced the company sold political data of many of its users.

These are among the allegations from a comprehensive investigation of Facebook by the New York Times, published Wednesday.

News of the investigation hit the company’s stock, which fell 2% in Thursday morning trading.

Earlier this year, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg testified before Congress about what he and other company executives knew about how user data was used to tamper with the election.

Here are the details from the Facebook and Russia investigation:

Ethics are important

The big lesson is that it’s probably a best practice for public companies to behave ethically, and they are vulnerable to news of investigations when they do not. Not only their stocks, but ultimately the value of the companies themselves, are determined by how responsible companies are to their customers and shareholders.

Further, the ethical values and actions of companies are something that investors might consider before making an investment.

Companies can bow to pressure

Both private and public companies are frequently the subject of investigations, which can often prompt change for the better.

Walmart: In 2012 and 2013, fatalities from a factory fire and factory collapse at facilities that the giant retailer uses to manufacture garments in Bangladesh, put Walmart under the microscope for its safety standards overseas. (H&M and the Gap also used the factory that collapsed in Bangladesh.) Walmart refused to sign on to a legally binding agreement to improve standards, but set up an alliance to improve the safety of workers in that country.

Nike: In the 1990s, Nike was found to have maintained sweatshop working conditions in its overseas factories. News reports prompted improved conditions and now Nike is often viewed as a model for manufacturing standards in emerging markets.

Uber: After numerous scandals involving alleged sexual harassment, spying, false advertising, and other possible misdeeds, the ride-sharing company got rid of its chief executive officer and replaced him in 2017 with a new leader who hopes to rebuild relationships with customers and communities.

How can you know if a company is doing the right thing?

It’s important to do research on any company you or fund in which you plan to invest.

One good place to start is the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), where you can read all of the public documents that companies file every quarter about their operations.

By Jeremy Quittner
Jeremy Quittner is the senior writer for Stash.

Next for you
FAANG Stocks: What Are They?

Investment Profile

Bonds Worldwide

An International Bond ETF on Stash

Learn more
Explore more articlesChoose a topic to learn more about
social media Careers pop culture politics Retirement

This material has been distributed for informational and educational purposes only, represents an assessment of the market environment as of the date of publication, is subject to change without notice, and is not intended as investment, legal, accounting, or tax advice or opinion. Stash assumes no obligation to provide notifications of changes in any factors that could affect the information provided. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice regarding any issuer or security in particular. The strategies discussed are strictly for illustrative and educational purposes and should not be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell, or an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security. There is no guarantee that any strategies discussed will be effective.

Furthermore, the information presented does not take into consideration commissions, tax implications, or other transactional costs, which may significantly affect the economic consequences of a given strategy or investment decision. This information is not intended as a recommendation to invest in any particular asset class or strategy or as a promise of future performance. There is no guarantee that any investment strategy will work under all market conditions or is suitable for all investors. Each investor should evaluate their ability to invest long term, especially during periods of downturn in the market. Investors should not substitute these materials for professional services, and should seek advice from an independent advisor before acting on any information presented. Before investing, please carefully consider your willingness to take on risk and your financial ability to afford investment losses when deciding how much individual security exposure to have in your investment portfolio.

Past performance does not guarantee future results. There is a potential for loss as well as gain in investing. Stash does not represent in any manner that the circumstances described herein will result in any particular outcome. While the data and analysis Stash uses from third party sources is believed to be reliable, Stash does not guarantee the accuracy of such information. Nothing in this article should be considered as a solicitation or offer, or recommendation, to buy or sell any particular security or investment product or to engage in any investment strategy. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission. Stash does not provide personalized financial planning to investors, such as estate, tax, or retirement planning. Investment advisory services are only provided to investors who become Stash Clients pursuant to a written Advisory Agreement. For more information please visit