StashLearn
Financial education, no lectures.

Follow and listen to our podcast

Get the app
Teach MeMoney NewsMoney TalkStash
Money News

President Trump Wants to Add a “Space Force” to the U.S. Military

May 03, 2018

  • President Trump is floating the idea of adding a sixth branch to the military: A “Space Force”
  • The idea is a literal moonshot, even as space becomes increasingly weaponized
  • Aerospace and defense companies would likely be the biggest beneficiaries
3 min read

For President Trump, the sky has always been the limit. Until now.

Trump’s moonshot idea

Trump shared his moonshot idea of a sixth military branch for the first time in March during a speech in San Diego.

“My new national strategy for space recognizes that space is a war-fighting domain, just like the land, air, and sea,” Trump told a crowd of Marines during a March speech, according to reports. “We have the Air Force. We’ll have the space force.”

He recently rekindled the idea while welcoming the U.S. Military Academy’s football team to the White House. Aside from the basic concept of putting the military in space, little else is known about Trump’s proposed “Space Force.”

The military in space

While the president, at first, insisted that the idea was a joke, it’s unclear how serious he is about sending troops past the stratosphere. While outer space has traditionally been NASA’s domain, the military does have a history with the heavens.

“We have the Air Force. We’ll have the space force.”

Starting in the mid-1980s, the Air Force Space Command, also known as U.S. Space Command, has been the military’s primary conduit to extraterrestrial operations. That mostly includes the launching and operation of satellites.

If the U.S. has anything resembling a “Space Force”, then this is it–though it lacks rail gun-toting space soldiers and orbital howitzers. U.S. Space Command has probed the idea of a “Space Mission Force,” which would “prepare and present space forces as a ready force capable of operating in a contested, degraded and operationally-limited environment.”

Aside from that, the only known military space operations involve the Air Force’s one known spaceplane, the X-37B, which is unmanned and has only flown a handful of missions.

Houston, we have a problem

There are a few reasons Trump’s plan may have trouble getting off the launch pad.

First, the U.S. signed the Outer Space Treaty in 1967, which attempts to prevent countries from using outer space for “military purposes.” The treaty acts as a basic legal framework for international space law, and 105 countries are currently parties to it.

Second, the idea has to jump Congressional hurdles. The concept was actually included in the 2018 Defense authorization bill–it would have created the U.S. Space Corps, taking over the Air Force’s current space-based missions–but was given the thumbs down by lawmakers.

Finally, the Air Force has to be on board, which at the moment, it is not. When reporters asked Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson about the idea, she said that “The Pentagon is complicated enough.”

Sky-high costs, astronomical profit

Perhaps Trump’s biggest obstacle is finding a way to fund a new, space-based military branch. We don’t know what it would cost, but building an entire branch geared for zero-gravity combat would require an incredible amount of investment.

The closest thing we have for comparison is probably the creation of the Department of Homeland Security in 2003, which launched with 180,000 employees and a budget of $37.7 billion. The DHS’ most recent budget is around $70 billion.

The operating budget for a military branch is much higher, however. The 2019 budget request from the Air Force, for example, calls for more than $150 billion.

Who would benefit from a “Space Force?”

In the end, though, the creation of a “Space Force” would be a windfall for military and defense contractors–and, in turn, their shareholders.

The Department of Defense awards hundreds of billions of dollars in contracts to private corporations every year, for research, developing, and producing weapons. Companies like Lockheed Martin and Boeing are usually among the biggest recipients.

And a new branch of the military would require a lot of equipment–much of it incorporating new or yet-to-be developed technology to address the needs of extraterrestrial combat.

Investing, simplified

Start today with as little as $5

Get the App

By Sam Becker
Sam Becker is Stash's financial writer.

Next for you
8 Star Wars Worthy Innovations on the Cutting Edge of Space Exploration Technologies
Explore more articlesChoose a topic to learn more about
Careers politics pop culture market news budgeting
Disclaimers

This material has been distributed for informational and educational purposes only, represents an assessment of the market environment as of the date of publication, is subject to change without notice, and is not intended as investment, legal, accounting, or tax advice or opinion. Stash assumes no obligation to provide notifications of changes in any factors that could affect the information provided. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice regarding any issuer or security in particular. The strategies discussed are strictly for illustrative and educational purposes and should not be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell, or an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security. There is no guarantee that any strategies discussed will be effective.

Furthermore, the information presented does not take into consideration commissions, tax implications, or other transactional costs, which may significantly affect the economic consequences of a given strategy or investment decision. This information is not intended as a recommendation to invest in any particular asset class or strategy or as a promise of future performance. There is no guarantee that any investment strategy will work under all market conditions or is suitable for all investors. Each investor should evaluate their ability to invest long term, especially during periods of downturn in the market. Investors should not substitute these materials for professional services, and should seek advice from an independent advisor before acting on any information presented. Before investing, please carefully consider your willingness to take on risk and your financial ability to afford investment losses when deciding how much individual security exposure to have in your investment portfolio.

Past performance does not guarantee future results. There is a potential for loss as well as gain in investing. Stash does not represent in any manner that the circumstances described herein will result in any particular outcome. While the data and analysis Stash uses from third party sources is believed to be reliable, Stash does not guarantee the accuracy of such information. Nothing in this article should be considered as a solicitation or offer, or recommendation, to buy or sell any particular security or investment product or to engage in any investment strategy. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission. Stash does not provide personalized financial planning to investors, such as estate, tax, or retirement planning. Investment advisory services are only provided to investors who become Stash Clients pursuant to a written Advisory Agreement. For more information please visit www.stashinvest.com/disclosures.