fbpx
StashLearn
Get started
Get the app

Join millions of investors on Stash

Investing, simplified

Start today with as little as $5
Get the app
Money News

Why Did President Trump Kill a Corporate Merger?

March 16, 2018

  • President Trump stopped a takeover deal between Broadcom Ltd. and Qualcomm Inc.
  • The merger would have given other countries, particularly China, more sway over the tech sector
  • Trump cited national security concerns, but the decision could have bigger implications
3 min read

President Trump has squashed a proposed merger between chip makers Broadcom and Qualcomm, citing national security concerns, through an executive order. The deal, which fell apart after the order was issued, would have combined two of the world’s leading microchip manufacturers.

Qualcomm is one of the largest chip manufacturers in the U.S. Broadcom is headquartered in Singapore, but is exploring a move to California. It’s also among the world’s biggest chip makers, along with companies like Samsung and Intel.

What’s a microchip?

Microchips are the small packets of circuits that are used for computing. Acting as semiconductors, microchips are used in all sorts of consumer products, from automobiles to smartphones, and even appliances. They’re small and are assembled through a complex manufacturing process.

In 2017, total microchip sales totaled more than $412 billion globally according to industry data.

Trump steps in

Presidents don’t often step in to block a corporate merger. In fact, this is only the fifth time it has ever happened. Nevertheless, it’s the second attempt by the Trump administration. The justice department also sued to stop a proposed merger between AT&T and Time Warner, reportedly over antitrust concerns.

In 2017, total microchip sales totaled more than $412B globally according to industry data

But the Broadcom-Qualcomm deal? The president’s motivations are less clear, which is what has many people wondering what the implications are.

What does this have to do with national security?

The Trump administration’s primary concern, as it relates to national security, has to do with the importance of the microchip industry. Chips can be found in almost everything these days — from refrigerators to smartphones — and a merger between Broadcom and Qualcomm potentially allows economic adversaries like China to have more influence over the industry.

Many of the world’s biggest chip manufacturers are in Asia, including countries like South Korea, Taiwan, and Japan.

The fear is that if other countries have too much sway over chipmakers, they’ll in turn have power over American tech companies. If the world’s chipmakers were all concentrated in Asia, for example, security flaws or a shortage (artificial or otherwise) could be disastrous for businesses and consumers in the U.S.

Qualcomm also plays an important role in supplying technology to the military, and regulators have expressed concern that Broadcom could gut the company’s research and development teams, putting America at a disadvantage.

Broadcom has disputed the Trump administration’s claims. It said in a statement earlier this week, it “strongly disagrees that its proposed acquisition of Qualcomm raises any national security concerns,” according to CNN. The company had also previously offered to set up a $1.5 billion fund to train U.S. engineers, and to establish the U.S. as leader in microchips.

Why should it matter to you?

On the surface, it wouldn’t seem like the scuttling of one merger between two companies would mean much. But it was the manner in which it was done, and the potential for retaliation by foreign governments, that could lead to issues, according to industry experts.

By sinking the Qualcomm deal, the Trump administration could hurt U.S. interests abroad, according to industry analysts. U.S. companies, for example, could similarly be blocked from acquiring companies overseas, according to reports.

The Trump administration has already stoked fears of a trade war after imposing tariffs on steel and aluminum, and his decision to block this deal is adding to experts’ fears. China, for example, could hit back, by drawing the U.S. into a trade war. Even though Broadcom, in this case, isn’t a Chinese company, it does have ties to China.

And just a whiff of a trade war has the power to potentially sink the markets and hurt investors.

 

By Sam Becker

Next for you
A Healthy Merger? Why CVS Wants to Buy Aetna for $69B

Investment Profile

Legal Cannabis Industry

Get all the details on investing in marijuana and the cannabis industry legally.

Learn more
Explore more articlesChoose a topic to learn more about
social media Retirement budgeting love and money politics
Disclaimers

This material has been distributed for informational and educational purposes only, represents an assessment of the market environment as of the date of publication, is subject to change without notice, and is not intended as investment, legal, accounting, or tax advice or opinion. Stash assumes no obligation to provide notifications of changes in any factors that could affect the information provided. This information should not be relied upon by the reader as research or investment advice regarding any issuer or security in particular. The strategies discussed are strictly for illustrative and educational purposes and should not be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell, or an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any security. There is no guarantee that any strategies discussed will be effective.

Furthermore, the information presented does not take into consideration commissions, tax implications, or other transactional costs, which may significantly affect the economic consequences of a given strategy or investment decision. This information is not intended as a recommendation to invest in any particular asset class or strategy or as a promise of future performance. There is no guarantee that any investment strategy will work under all market conditions or is suitable for all investors. Each investor should evaluate their ability to invest long term, especially during periods of downturn in the market. Investors should not substitute these materials for professional services, and should seek advice from an independent advisor before acting on any information presented. Before investing, please carefully consider your willingness to take on risk and your financial ability to afford investment losses when deciding how much individual security exposure to have in your investment portfolio.

Past performance does not guarantee future results. There is a potential for loss as well as gain in investing. Stash does not represent in any manner that the circumstances described herein will result in any particular outcome. While the data and analysis Stash uses from third party sources is believed to be reliable, Stash does not guarantee the accuracy of such information. Nothing in this article should be considered as a solicitation or offer, or recommendation, to buy or sell any particular security or investment product or to engage in any investment strategy. No part of this material may be reproduced in any form, or referred to in any other publication, without express written permission. Stash does not provide personalized financial planning to investors, such as estate, tax, or retirement planning. Investment advisory services are only provided to investors who become Stash Clients pursuant to a written Advisory Agreement. For more information please visit www.stashinvest.com/disclosures.